Tuesday, 20 September 2011

Guardian Phone Hacking Prezi

In light of the phone hacking scandal, the Guardian have created a Prezi document timeline-ing everything that has happened so far. It is a useful source because it is full of information and quotes from everyone involved, from politicians to the hierarchy of News International, the institution most strongly linked with the hacking.
It is particularly interesting to see how long these journalists were breaking the law for - from as far back as 2002. The law has stood for a long time that nobody can hack a phone under British law, and this is assisted by the Press Complaints Commission.





Press Complaints Commission






The PCC
Because newspapers are self regulated, part of the idea of the free press, there is a complaints commission which looks over the press. The commission is funded by the newspapers that comply with its code of practice. These are the things that journalists are not allowed to partake in/use get stories:

  1. Accuracy
  2. Opportunity to reply
  3. Privacy
  4. Harassment
  5. Intrusion into grief or shock
  6. Children
  7. Children in sex cases
  8. Hospitals
  9. Reporting of crime
  10. Misrepresentation
  11. Victims of sexual assault
  12. Discrimination
  13. Financial journalism
  14. Confidential sources
  15. Witness payments in criminal trials
  16. Payment to criminals
However, while so many of these were broken by the News of the World in particular, the PCC were described as "absent" by Prime Minister David Cameron. He also said that the PCC should be replaced by another more effective service, in light of their inadequate action.
Newspaper executives were recorded secretly speaking about the PCC saying things like "Getting a PCC isn't great, but a lot of papers just brush it aside, all it is is a little apology somewhere in the paper, upi get a slap on the wrist, you get reported by the PCC, but there's no money." This shows that newspapers aren't threatened by the PCC's rules, and perhaps break the law more frequently than is reported because the PCC don't take hard enough action on them.

This is all very relevant to my own work, as the PCC sets out guidelines that I will have to follow.

2 comments:

  1. Good work - you are following media stories that are relevant to your brief and developing a good understanding of the regulations surrounding the press.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This shows proficient/excellent research into legal considerations of your chosen genre.

    ReplyDelete